Where Art and Science Meet: Creativity and Nuance in Dog Training

The essence of dog training often transcends the rigidity of science. photo: AdobeStock

In most dog training, robust scientific evidence typically underpins established principles. Despite the industry's lack of formal regulation, conscientious trainers generally adhere to an evidence-based approach, committing themselves to continual professional development to stay on top of the latest research and scientific advancements. This commitment ensures the highest standard of practice for their clients. 

But the essence of dog training often transcends the rigidity of science, and it’s in the nuanced application of these principles that the training process becomes an art form. While scientific methodology provides an important framework for understanding canine behavior, the artistry of dog training lies in the trainer's ability to interpret and adapt these methods to a dog’s individual circumstances, personality, and environment. 

Because we live in a capitalist society, dog trainers often market their application of science with a special name, branding it as their own unique technique. But this is merely an attempt to sell their application to others, and it misses the mark because effective dog training is always a study of one. A one-size-fits-all approach simply doesn’t work. While learning standardized methods can be important for new trainers, effective behavior modification should always be fine-tuned to the individual dog and human team.

Let's explore this concept with the current evidence-based techniques used to curb leash reactivity in dogs: desensitization and counterconditioning. Desensitization involves gradually exposing the dog to their trigger at a level that causes little to no problematic behavior and then incrementally increasing the exposure as the dog continues to show minimal problematic responses. Counterconditioning, on the other hand, aims to elicit a different emotional response from the original trigger than what was initially observed.

In the context of leash reactivity, this typically involves transforming the dog's initial emotional response - often a negative or aggressive reaction to other dogs on a leash - into a more positive or neutral emotion. The goal is for the dog to exhibit calm and relaxed behaviors in the presence of other dogs without lunging and barking. 

Both desensitization and counterconditioning have proven to be effective in addressing leash reactivity. However, challenges may arise in specific situations. If attempts at desensitization and counterconditioning are unsuccessful, it's often not the method that's at fault, but the application. This is where the art of dog training comes into play.

When it comes to desensitizing a dog to encountering another dog on leash, many people assume this means starting with the dog at a distance from another dog, ensuring there is enough space that their dog can handle the exposure with minimal stress. This is one approach, primarily focusing on the visual aspect. 

Alternatively, you could begin by desensitizing your dog to the sound of another dog. This might involve using a recording of a dog barking or working in your backyard while the neighbor's dog barks in theirs. Still another option would be to start by desensitizing your dog to the scent of another dog, such as by exposing your dog to a towel that was used as bedding by another dog the previous week. The best approach for your unique situation with your leash-reactive dog is a question for you and your trainer to discuss and determine.

Now let's explore counterconditioning. Typically, most people start by positioning their dog at a distance from other dogs, where they can see the other dog without reacting problematically. Then they begin to associate the sight of the dog at that distance with something the dog finds pleasant, such as food rewards. The basic concept is that the dog notices another dog in the distance and then immediately receives food. This is a simplified explanation of the technique, but the application is actually much more complex and nuanced. Just as with desensitization, you might choose to start with visual triggers or auditory or olfactory cues when counterconditioning a leash-reactive dog.

Let’s start counterconditioning with the visual trigger where a dog notices another dog at a distance. What will that setup look like? What occurs before behavior is an essential part of the equation, and there is no one-size-fits-all approach to setting up a training session. It depends on the individual dog and human involved, as well as the environment in which they exist. 

One option could be to teach the dog to settle on a mat and relax before beginning counterconditioning. Another option might involve teaching the dog to move quickly with the trainer on cue, establishing this movement on a leash as the foundation before starting counterconditioning. Alternatively, one might teach the dog to perform a series of tricks and behaviors to engage them with fun activities before setting up for counterconditioning. These are just a few of the many options available for an individual setup.

Reward placement is another factor to consider. This refers to the location of the reward source, which could be from a pocket on the trainer's right or left side, or even from a container behind them. The treats could be in the trainer's hand, in a bait bag, or in a container placed at a distance. Each variation in reward placement will influence the dog's behavior over time.

Reward delivery, which describes how the reward is given to the dog, also offers numerous options. The treat may be tossed for the dog to catch, handed directly for them to take from the trainer's hand, or placed on the ground in various positions relative to the dog's and trainer's location. The reward delivery could even be integrated into a game, like prompting the dog to "catch," "chase," or "find" it. The possibilities are vast, and each will slightly differ in its influence on behavior. This is where the art of dog training truly emerges. The method that works best for a specific situation must be carefully considered.

Teaching a dog to sit may be achieved through various methods, all falling under the umbrella of evidence-based practices. One effective method is lure/reward training, which involves placing a piece of food on the dog's nose and luring it upwards and backwards until their rear end touches the floor, rewarding the behavior once completed. Another variation is capturing the behavior. This method sets up a scenario where the dog is likely to sit on their own, then marks and rewards the behavior when it occurs. For instance, bringing the dog into the living room and onto a carpeted surface might naturally encourage them to sit after a period of waiting.

Another approach is targeting, using an elevated surface, such as an ottoman or chair, and asking the dog to climb onto it. If the surface is small enough, they are likely to sit once they are up there, allowing the trainer to reward the behavior. Alternatively, the dog could be taught to target the trainer's hand with their nose for a treat. Once they understand this behavior, the target could be presented above the dog's head and slightly backward, prompting them to look up and likely sit. There are many other ways to teach a dog to sit, and the most effective method will depend on the individual dog and situation.

Another common problem is excessive barking, and again, this is not something that benefits from a one-size-fits-all approach. The underlying emotions causing the dog to bark could be explored and a combination of counterconditioning and desensitization techniques applied. Another approach would be to train and reinforce alternative behaviors that are incompatible with barking, such as moving away from the front door upon request, or fetching a toy to hold in their mouth. Yet another approach might focus on stimulus control, teaching the dog to bark and to be quiet on cue. 

All these options fall under the umbrella of evidence-based dog training practices. Choosing the best method for a particular dog and situation involves assessing the dog’s unique circumstances and deciding how best to apply these practices. That’s where science becomes art.

In fact, the practice of dog training is a sophisticated blend of both science and art. While evidence-based methods provide a solid framework of proven techniques for addressing behaviors like leash reactivity, excessive barking, and basic cues like sitting, the real mastery lies in the application of these techniques. 

Each dog is an individual with unique needs, emotions, and circumstances.  Whether using desensitization, counterconditioning, teaching alternative behaviors, or stimulus control, the approach must be tailored to each dog’s situation. This transforms the systematic science of dog training into an art, demanding creativity, intuition, and a deep understanding of canine behavior. By viewing training through this lens, trainers can achieve more effective and humane results, forging deeper connections and enhancing the lives of the dogs they train.

Sara Scott

Sara Scott is a Certified Professional Dog Trainer and Certified Separation Anxiety Behavior Consultant who has been training dogs professionally since 2000. She focuses on educating dog owners about canine behavior and advocates for evidence-based methods in the dog training world. Sara offers a bespoke coaching program tailored to individual needs. Follow her online at @dogtrainingwithsara and visit her website for more information.

https://www.oaklanddogtrainer.com
Previous
Previous

A Little Help From Our Friends: Therapy Dogs Bring Comfort and Joy

Next
Next

Register Now! Canine Science Symposium, San Francisco State University, May 18-19